Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-6841 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6841 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 14, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 173 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Devino HARDING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toni V. BAIR, David A. Williams, Randall B. Kahelski, Larry Platt, Edward C. Morris, Patricia A. Edge, J.D. Bentley, B.A. Ingram, H.B. Cassada, C.D. Lawsen, J.P. McMi
More

918 F.2d 173
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Devino HARDING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Toni V. BAIR, David A. Williams, Randall B. Kahelski, Larry
Platt, Edward C. Morris, Patricia A. Edge, J.D. Bentley,
B.A. Ingram, H.B. Cassada, C.D. Lawsen, J.P. McMillian,
Central Classification Board, Layton T. Lester, Charles
Thompson, Major Thorne, Patrick Guerney, G.M. Harvell,
Joanne Royster, and other unknown members of Institutional
Classification Committee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6841.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 14, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-321-N)

Devino Harding, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Devino Harding appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harding v. Bair, CA-89-321-N (E.D.Va. May 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer