Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chester Wm. Ogle-El v. Jeff D. Hill (p.a.), Sterlin Suddarth (Md), Mason Waters (Warden), 90-7118 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7118 Visitors: 36
Filed: Nov. 14, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 173 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Chester Wm. OGLE-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff D. HILL (P.A.), Sterlin Suddarth (MD), Mason Waters (Warden), Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-7118. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted O
More

918 F.2d 173
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Chester Wm. OGLE-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jeff D. HILL (P.A.), Sterlin Suddarth (MD), Mason Waters
(Warden), Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7118.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 14, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-89-3519-MJG)

Chester Wm. Ogle-El, appellant pro se.

Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Chester Wm. Ogle-El appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ogle-El v. Hill, CA-89-3519-MJG (D.Md. Aug. 16, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer