Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bernard Smith v. Patrick Whalen, 90-6895 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6895 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 174 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Bernard SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick WHALEN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-6895. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 19, 1990. Appeal from the Unit
More

918 F.2d 174
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bernard SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Patrick WHALEN, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 90-6895.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CA-90-140-R)

Bernard Smith, appellant pro se.

Robert William Jaspen, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Bernard Smith appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Whalen, CA-90-140-R (E.D.Va. Aug. 27, 1990). We also deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer