Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Fred Lewis Grose, 90-7269 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7269 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 20, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 956 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Lewis GROSE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-7269. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 20, 1990. Appeal fr
More

918 F.2d 956
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Fred Lewis GROSE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-7269.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CR-87-78; CA-89-1165)

Fred Lewis Grose, appellant pro se.

Michael Warren Carey, United States Attorney, Charleston, W.Va., for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Fred Lewis Grose appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grose, CR-87-78; CA-89-1165 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 22, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer