Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. John Thomas Hall, 90-6877 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6877 Visitors: 31
Filed: Nov. 20, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 956 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Thomas HALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-6877. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 20, 1990. Appeal fr
More

918 F.2d 956
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Thomas HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6877.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-88-233)

John Thomas Hall, appellant pro se.

William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, S.C., for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

John Thomas Hall appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall, CR-88-233 (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer