Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Terrence L. Houchins v. M.L. Love, Jr., Horry County Administrator, 90-1134 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-1134 Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 920 F.2d 926 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Terrence L. HOUCHINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.L. LOVE, Jr., Horry County Administrator, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-1134. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 3, 1990. Decided Dec
More

920 F.2d 926
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terrence L. HOUCHINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M.L. LOVE, Jr., Horry County Administrator, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-1134.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.

Appeal from the united States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Clyde H. Hamilton, District Judge. (CA-90-306-4-15B)

Terrence L. Houchins, appellant pro se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Terrence L. Houchins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Houchins v. Love, CA-90-306-4-15B (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer