Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jose Santo Urrutia, 90-6671 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6671 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 17, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 920 F.2d 927 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Santo URRUTIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-6671. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 3, 1990. Decided Dec. 17, 1990. Appeal f
More

920 F.2d 927
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Santo URRUTIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6671.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1409-AM, CR-85-195-A)

Jose Santo Urrutia, appellant pro se.

Earle Giovanniello, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jose Santo Urrutia appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Urrutia, CA-90-1409-AM; CR-85-195-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer