Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

90-6660 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6660 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 04, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 924 F.2d 1052 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry V. SMITH, individually and as a Maryland State Trooper with the Barracks located at Hagerstown, Maryland, Defendant-Appellee. Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More

924 F.2d 1052
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry V. SMITH, individually and as a Maryland State Trooper
with the Barracks located at Hagerstown, Maryland,
Defendant-Appellee.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry V. SMITH, individually and as a Maryland State Trooper
with the Barracks located at Hagerstown, Maryland,
Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 90-6660, 90-6679.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 1990.
Decided Feb. 4, 1991.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-83-122-K)

Aaron Holsey, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., Millicent Edwards Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Pikesville, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

In these consolidated cases, Aaron Holsey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.* Our review of the record, the district court's opinion, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holsey v. Smith, CA-83-122-K (D.Md. Aug. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Holsey filed two notices of appeal from the same final order

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer