Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mark Lomar Johnson v. Larry W. Huffman, S. Conners, D. Swisher, 90-7166 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7166 Visitors: 40
Filed: Mar. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 928 F.2d 399 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Mark Lomar JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry W. HUFFMAN, S. Conners, D. Swisher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-7166. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1991. Decided Marc
More

928 F.2d 399
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mark Lomar JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry W. HUFFMAN, S. Conners, D. Swisher, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 18, 1991.
Decided March 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-88-605-R)

Mark Lamar Johnson, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Mark Lomar Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Huffman, CA-88-605-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer