Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-6383 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6383 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 12, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 928 F.2d 400 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William H. WYATT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph HARPER, Jr., Sheriff; Captain Evans; Lieutenant Reed, Defendants-Appellees, and Rodney Mosbey; Kevin Brown, Deputy; Jeffrey Edmunds, Assistant Commonwea
More

928 F.2d 400
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William H. WYATT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph HARPER, Jr., Sheriff; Captain Evans; Lieutenant
Reed, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Rodney Mosbey; Kevin Brown, Deputy; Jeffrey Edmunds,
Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; Ms. Bolling,
Medic, Defendants.

No. 90-6383.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 1990.
Decided March 12, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-89-182-N)

William H. Wyatt, Jr., appellant pro se.

John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Stuart Hamilton Dunn, Shuford, Rubin, Gibney & Dunn, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

William H. Wyatt, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wyatt v. Harper, CA-89-182-N (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer