Filed: Mar. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HECTOR REINAT, a/k/a Chico, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00126-2) Submitted: March 5, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HECTOR REINAT, a/k/a Chico, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00126-2) Submitted: March 5, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7354
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HECTOR REINAT, a/k/a Chico,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00126-2)
Submitted: March 5, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hector Reinat, Appellant Pro Se. Miller A. Bushong, III, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Beckley, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hector Reinat appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. See United States v. Reinat, No. 1:05-cr-00126-
2 (S.D. W. Va. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2