Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roy Smith v. Warden Lindler, 90-6615 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6615 Visitors: 30
Filed: Apr. 02, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 929 F.2d 694 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Roy SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden LINDLER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-6615. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 13, 1990. Decided April 2, 1991. Appeal from the United S
More

929 F.2d 694
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roy SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Warden LINDLER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 90-6615.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 13, 1990.
Decided April 2, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-377-3)

Roy Smith, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, S.C., for appellee.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Roy Smith seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. Smith v. Lindler, CA-90-377-3 (D.S.C. July 9, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer