Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Benjamin Frank Fairley, 91-7254 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7254 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 20, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 929 F.2d 695 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Frank FAIRLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7254. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1991. Decided March 20, 1991. Ap
More

929 F.2d 695
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benjamin Frank FAIRLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-87-27; CA-90-456)

Benjamin Frank Fairley, appellant pro se.

Rocco Joseph deGrasse, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Benjamin Frank Fairley appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Fairley's motion for an emergency hearing and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fairley, CR-87-27, CA-90-456 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer