Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul D.J. West v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Agent, 91-6520 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6520 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 20, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 929 F.2d 695 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Paul D.J. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AGENT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-6520. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1991. Decided March 20,
More

929 F.2d 695
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul D.J. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AGENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6520.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-90-1635-AM)

Paul D.J. West, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Paul D.J. West appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. West v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. Agent, CA-90-1635-AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer