Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charlie F. Reese v. Harry L. Allsbrook, John Stanley, Doctor, John H. Wood, George W. Smiley, 91-7018 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7018 Visitors: 167
Filed: Apr. 26, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 931 F.2d 55 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charlie F. REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry L. ALLSBROOK, John Stanley, Doctor, John H. Wood, George W. Smiley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7018. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitte
More

931 F.2d 55
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charlie F. REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry L. ALLSBROOK, John Stanley, Doctor, John H. Wood,
George W. Smiley, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7018.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 8, 1991.
Decided April 26, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-722)

Charlie F. Reese, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charlie F. Reese appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reese v. Allsbrook, CA-90-722 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1991). We deny Reese's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer