Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Allan James Berube, 91-6782 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6782 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 13, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 932 F.2d 964 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan James BERUBE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-6782. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1991. Decided May 13, 1991. Appeal f
More

932 F.2d 964
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Allan James BERUBE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6782.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 1991.
Decided May 13, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Woodrow Wilson Jones, Senior District Judge. (CR-1272-SH; CA-89-139-SH)

Allan James Berube, appellant pro se.

Thomas J. Ashcraft, United States Attorney, Charlotte, N.C., for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Allan James Berube appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Berube, CR-1272-SH; CA-89-139-SH (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer