Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Frank Darryl Allen v. Edward W. Murray, Officer Hodges, Officer Martin, 91-6265 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6265 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 31, 1991
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2017
Summary: 935 F.2d 267 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frank Darryl ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Officer Hodges, Officer Martin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6265. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 27, 1991. Dec
More

935 F.2d 267
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank Darryl ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Officer Hodges, Officer Martin,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6265.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 27, 1991.
Decided May 31, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-89-1053-AM)

Frank Darryl Allen, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank Darryl Allen appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Murray, CA-89-1053-AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer