Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-6546 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6546 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 14, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1287 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Wayland Willard TALLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden WHALEN, and all staff that are responsible for the safe and human treatment of inmates: Richmond Hall Staff, Kitchen Staff, Escorting Officers to and
More

935 F.2d 1287
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wayland Willard TALLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden WHALEN, and all staff that are responsible for the
safe and human treatment of inmates: Richmond Hall Staff,
Kitchen Staff, Escorting Officers to and from destinations
within said institutions, Medical Staff, etc. of Petersburg
Federal Correction Institution, Petersburg, VA, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 14, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-90-509-AM)

Wayland Willard Talley, appellant pro se.

Robert Charles Erickson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Wayland Willard Talley appeals from the district court's order dismissing his federal suit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Talley v. Whalen, CA-90-509-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer