Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

G.K. Simmons, and Interiors Unique, Universal Design, Real Estate Corporation v. State of North Carolina, 91-1502 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-1502 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1287 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. G.K. SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Interiors Unique, Universal Design, Real Estate Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-1502. United States Court of Appeals,
More

935 F.2d 1287
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
G.K. SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Interiors Unique, Universal Design, Real Estate Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-1502.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-91-18-ST-C-MU)

G.K. Simmons, appellant pro se.

W.D.N.C.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

G.K. Simmons appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. State of North Carolina, CA-91-18-ST-C-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer