Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. James Thomas Donnelly, 91-7026 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7026 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 24, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1288 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Thomas DONNELLY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7026. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided June 24, 1991. Appe
More

935 F.2d 1288
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Thomas DONNELLY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7026.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 24, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-86-40-5)

James Thomas Donnelly, appellant pro se.

Linda Kaye Teal, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

James Thomas Donnelly appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 35(a) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Donnelly, CR-86-40-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer