Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dexter Travis Edgehill, 91-7561 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7561 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1288 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dexter Travis EDGEHILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7561. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided June 19, 1991. App
More

935 F.2d 1288
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dexter Travis EDGEHILL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7561.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-89-13-JFM; CA-90-2841-JFM)

Dexter Travis Edgehill, appellant pro se.

Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dexter Travis Edgehill appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edgehill, CR-89-13-JFM; CA-90-2841-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 27, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer