Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gary M. Silvers, 91-7588 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7588 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 940 F.2d 654 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary M. SILVERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7588. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 20, 1991. Decided July 30, 1991. Appeal fro
More

940 F.2d 654
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gary M. SILVERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7588.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1991.
Decided July 30, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge. (CR-87-144-Y)

Gary M. Silvers, appellant pro se.

Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Gary M. Silvers appeals from the district court's order granting his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce sentence. Silvers maintains that the sentence should have been reduced by more than two years. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion reveals that there was no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Silvers, CR-87-144-Y (D.Md. May 3, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer