Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stephanie R. Thompson v. Eldersburg Building Supply Company William A. Logan, 90-1172 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-1172 Visitors: 45
Filed: Jan. 29, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 953 F.2d 639 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Stephanie R. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELDERSBURG BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY; William A. Logan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-1172. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 22, 1991. Decided Jan. 29, 1992
More

953 F.2d 639

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stephanie R. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ELDERSBURG BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY; William A. Logan,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-1172.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 22, 1991.
Decided Jan. 29, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-89-3254-S)

Stephanie R. Thompson, appellant pro se.

Randolph Carl Knepper, Levin & Gann, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Stephanie R. Thompson appeals from the district court's order granting judgment on the merits in favor of Defendants on her Title VII claim. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Eldersburg Building Supply Co., No. CA-89-3254-S (D.Md. Nov. 29, 1990).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

On appeal, Thompson claims that her trial counsel was ineffective. There is no right to effective assistance of counsel in civil cases. See Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986); Nicholson v. Rushen, 767 F.2d 1426, 1427 (9th Cir.1985)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer