Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alvin Speight v. Adell Plastics, and Linda Reed, Maxine Robinson Berda Carmen Sherly, 91-1254 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-1254 Visitors: 37
Filed: Feb. 11, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 954 F.2d 720 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Alvin SPEIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADELL PLASTICS, Defendant-Appellee, and Linda Reed, Maxine Robinson; Berda; Carmen; Sherly, Defendants. No. 91-1254. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1992. De
More

954 F.2d 720

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alvin SPEIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ADELL PLASTICS, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Linda Reed, Maxine Robinson; Berda; Carmen; Sherly, Defendants.

No. 91-1254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 11, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-91-711-L)

Alvin Speight, appellant pro se.

Patrick Milton Pilachowski, Stephen David Shawe, Shawe & Rosenthal, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Alvin Speight appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's 42 U.S.C. § 20003 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Speight v. Adell Plastics, No. CA-91-711-L (D.Md. Nov. 11, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer