Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Christine Ann Carrigan v. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General Melanie C. Pereira, Warden, 91-7355 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7355 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 14, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 955 F.2d 40 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Christine Ann CARRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Joseph CURRAN, Jr., Attorney General; MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7355. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1992. Decided
More

955 F.2d 40

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Christine Ann CARRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. Joseph CURRAN, Jr., Attorney General; MELANIE C.
PEREIRA, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 14, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-91-2713-CV)

Christine Ann Carrigan, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Christine Ann Carrigan appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carrigan v. Curran, No. CA-91-2713-CV (D.Md. Oct. 11, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer