Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

E.Z. Bell v. Gary T. Dixon Mr. Sims John Doe, & Others Mr. Sills Mr. Stanley, 91-7232 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7232 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 21, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 955 F.2d 40 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. E.Z. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary T. DIXON; Mr. Sims; John Doe, & others; Mr. Sills; Mr. Stanley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7232. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1991. Decided Feb. 21, 19
More

955 F.2d 40

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
E.Z. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Mr. Sims; John Doe, & others; Mr. Sills;
Mr. Stanley, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7232.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1991.
Decided Feb. 21, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-90-102-BO)

E.Z. Bell, appellant pro se.

Ronna Dawn Gibbs, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

E.Z. Bell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Dixon, No. CA-90-102-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer