Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gregory Keith Peery v. Michael W. Cox, Sheriff, Amherst County Clarence W. Ingalls, Lieutenant Dennis E. Burns, M.D., 91-7361 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7361 Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 18, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 955 F.2d 42 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Gregory Keith PEERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael W. COX, Sheriff, Amherst County; Clarence W. Ingalls, Lieutenant; Dennis E. Burns, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7361. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submit
More

955 F.2d 42

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory Keith PEERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael W. COX, Sheriff, Amherst County; Clarence W.
Ingalls, Lieutenant; Dennis E. Burns, M.D.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 18, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-500-R)

Gregory Keith Peery, appellant pro se.

William Sampson Kerr, Appomattox, Virginia; Bevin Ray Alexander, Jr., Edmunds & Williams, P.C., Lynchburg, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Gregory Keith Peery appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peery v. Cox, No. CA-90-500-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer