Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ricky Lynn Kemper, 91-7725 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7725 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 24, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 955 F.2d 42 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Lynn KEMPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7725. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1992. Decided Feb. 24, 1992. Appeal from the United States Dis
More

955 F.2d 42

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ricky Lynn KEMPER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7725.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 1992.
Decided Feb. 24, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-134-H, CA-91-1973-H)

Ricky Lynn Kemper, appellant pro se.

Lisa M. Griffin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Ricky Lynn Kemper appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kemper, Nos. CR-89-134-H, CA-91-1973-H (D.Md. Nov. 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer