Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Walter L. Green v. Lonnie Saunders, 92-6385 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6385 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 15, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1442 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter L. GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie SAUNDERS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6385. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 15, 1992 Appeal from the United States District Co
More

966 F.2d 1442

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter L. GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Lonnie SAUNDERS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6385.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-416-R)

Walter L. Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter L. Green noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny Green's motion for appointment of counsel; we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer