Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

92-6399 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6399 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 16, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1442 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward A. GANEY, JR., Appellant, Leroy JACKSON, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Gary SMITH, Plaintiff, v. G. Ross WINGO; Aaron J. Johnson; Louis R. Colombo; Wanda J. Garrett; Katrena B. Horton; Arlene
More

966 F.2d 1442

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward A. GANEY, JR., Appellant,
Leroy JACKSON, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Gary SMITH, Plaintiff,
v.
G. Ross WINGO; Aaron J. Johnson; Louis R. Colombo; Wanda
J. Garrett; Katrena B. Horton; Arlene C. Pulley;
Joseph Slate Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6399.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-839-F)

Edward A. Ganey, Jr., Leroy Jackson, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Edward A. Ganey, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Wingo, No. CA-91-839-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We interpret Ganey's claim of denial of access to be an attack on the lack of photocopying and typewriting privileges and the inability of inmates to aid each other in filing claims

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer