Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thompson B. Hawkins-El v. Paul Davis, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission, 92-6410 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6410 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jun. 16, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1442 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Thompson B. HAWKINS-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul DAVIS, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-6410. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 16, 1992 App
More

966 F.2d 1442

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thompson B. HAWKINS-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul DAVIS, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6410.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-3602-K)

Thompson B. Hawkins-El, Appellant Pro Se.

George Albert Eichhorn, III, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Thompson B. Hawkins-El appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Hawkins-El v. Davis, No. CA-91-3602-K (D. Md. Mar. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that Hawkins-El's claim for injunctive relief in addition to damages is moot, because he was paroled during the pendency of this appeal

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer