Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robin Edward Lewis v. John R. Newhart, Sheriff of Chesapeake City Jail, 92-6276 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6276 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1443 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robin Edward LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John R. NEWHART, Sheriff of Chesapeake City Jail, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-6276. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 30, 1992 Decided: June 3, 1992 Appeal
More

966 F.2d 1443

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robin Edward LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John R. NEWHART, Sheriff of Chesapeake City Jail, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6276.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 30, 1992
Decided: June 3, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-91-1605)

Robin Edward Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Robin Edward Lewis filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer