Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Milton Earl Robinson, 92-6383 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6383 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 15, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1445 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Milton Earl ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-6383. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 15, 1992 Appeal from the United States
More

966 F.2d 1445

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Milton Earl ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6383.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Hiram H. Ward, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-160-G, CA-91-350-4)

Milton Earl Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Milton Earl Robinson appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robinson, Nos. CR-90-160-G, CA-91-350-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer