Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edward John White, Jr. v. United States, 92-6421 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6421 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 17, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 966 F.2d 1446 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward John WHITE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6421. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 1, 1992 Decided: June 17, 1992 Appeal from the United St
More

966 F.2d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward John WHITE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6421.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-24-HC)

Edward John White, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Edward John White, Jr., a federal prisoner incarcerated in Tennessee, appeals the district court's order denying his request for bail pending appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition without prejudice. This Court recently upheld the district court's dismissal without prejudice and the mandate has issued. White v. United States, No. 92-6192 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 1992) (unpublished).

2

Because White's appeal has been decided, his request for bail pending that appeal is moot. We vacate the decision denying bail and remand to the district court with directions to dismiss White's motion. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950); Maryland Highways Contractors Ass'n v. Maryland, 933 F.2d 1246 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 60 U.S.L.W. 3342 (U.S. 1991).

3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer