Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chester A. Giza Yueh-Hua Giza v. Consolidation Coal Co., 19-4262 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-4262 Visitors: 49
Filed: Aug. 11, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 339 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Chester A. GIZA; Yueh-Hua Giza, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-1059. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: July 8, 1992 Decided: August 11, 1992 Appeal from the Unite
More

972 F.2d 339

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Chester A. GIZA; Yueh-Hua Giza, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CONSOLIDATION COAL CO., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-1059.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued: July 8, 1992
Decided: August 11, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-85-56-W-S)

ARGUED: James B. Stoneking, Bordas & Bordas, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants.

Robert Mason Steptoe, Jr., Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: David A. Jividen, Bordas & Bordas, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants.

William F. Rohrbaugh, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

N.D.W.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Chester A. and Yueh-Hua Giza appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendant Consolidation Coal Company. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the opinion of the district court. See J.A. at 114-32.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer