Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Claude Richard Huggins v. North Carolina Parole Commission, 92-6573 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6573 Visitors: 30
Filed: Aug. 06, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 340 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Claude Richard HUGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA Parole Commission, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-6573. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 6, 1992 Appeal from the Un
More

972 F.2d 340

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Claude Richard HUGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA Parole Commission, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6573.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-91-BR)

Claude Richard Huggins, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Claude Richard Huggins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Huggins v. North Carolina Parole Comm'n, No. CA-92-91-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

In addition to the reasoning of the district court, we note that a potential parolee has no constitutional right of access to his prison files. Ross v. Woodard, 683 F.2d 846 (4th Cir. 1982)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer