Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steven Moxley v. P. Massie, Sergeant R. L. Boyers, Lieutenant L. W. Huffman, Regional Administrator, 92-6248 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6248 Visitors: 44
Filed: Aug. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 341 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steven MOXLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P. MASSIE, Sergeant; R. L. Boyers, Lieutenant; L. W. Huffman, Regional Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6248. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 20, 19
More

972 F.2d 341

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven MOXLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
P. MASSIE, Sergeant; R. L. Boyers, Lieutenant; L. W.
Huffman, Regional Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6248.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 3, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-666-R)

Steven Moxley, Appellant Pro Se.

William Rundahl Coleman, Office of The Attorney General OF Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Steven Moxley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moxley v. Massie, No. CA-91-666-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer