Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Percy D. Taylor v. City of Richmond, Virginia Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia Richmond Public Schools Westbrook Hospital, 92-6529 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6529 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 07, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 342 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Percy D. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY of RICHMOND, Virginia; Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia; Richmond Public Schools; Westbrook Hospital, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6529. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circ
More

972 F.2d 342

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Percy D. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY of RICHMOND, Virginia; Blue Cross & Blue Shield of
Virginia; Richmond Public Schools; Westbrook
Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6529.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 7, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Percy D. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Percy D. Taylor filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We deny Taylor's motion to amend his complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer