Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Randy Harold Orr, 92-6614 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6614 Visitors: 40
Filed: Aug. 06, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 343 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Harold ORR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-6614. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 20, 1992 Decided: August 6, 1992 Appeal from the United States Di
More

972 F.2d 343

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Randy Harold ORR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6614.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-227-A)

Randy Harold Orr, Appellant Pro Se.

Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Randy Harold Orr appeals from the district court's order that denied his motion for sentencing credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (1988) for time he spent on pre-trial bond with various conditions. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Orr, No. CR-90-227-A (W.D.N.C. May 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer