Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronald Watkins v. Roosevelt Nelson Harvey Jenkins, Correctional Officer T. Wilson, Institutional Investigator, 91-7362 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7362 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 29, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 972 F.2d 344 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roosevelt NELSON; Harvey Jenkins, Correctional Officer; T. Wilson, Institutional Investigator, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7362. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: A
More

972 F.2d 344

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roosevelt NELSON; Harvey Jenkins, Correctional Officer; T.
Wilson, Institutional Investigator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7362.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 1992
Decided: July 29, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Ronald Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Ronald Watkins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Watkins v. Nelson, No. CA-90-706-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer