Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Troy Lester v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Jewell Ridge Coal Company, 92-1733 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1733 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 11, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 980 F.2d 727 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Troy LESTER, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor; Jewell Ridge Coal Company, Respondents. No. 92-1733. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Sep
More

980 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Troy LESTER, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor; Jewell Ridge Coal
Company, Respondents.

No. 92-1733.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 30, 1992
Decided: December 11, 1992

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (88-3166-BLA)

Troy Lester, Petitioner Pro Se.

Patricia May Nece, Nancy Grace Feeney, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.; Monroe Jamison, Jr., Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Troy Lester seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1991). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Lester v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, BRB No. 88-3166-BLA (Ben. Rev. Bd. Jan. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer