Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jerry Earl Jones v. Corrections Officer Kevin L. Hall, 92-6699 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6699 Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 11, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 980 F.2d 727 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jerry Earl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Corrections Officer Kevin L. HALL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-6699. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 30, 1992 Decided: December 11, 1992 Appeal from the
More

980 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerry Earl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Corrections Officer Kevin L. HALL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6699.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 30, 1992
Decided: December 11, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-90-1136-AM)

Jerry E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Jerry E. Jones appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Hall, No. CA90-1136-AM (E.D. Va. June 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer