Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Worrell Robotham, 92-6129 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6129 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 30, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 980 F.2d 728 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Worrell ROBOTHAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-6129. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 26, 1992 Decided: November 30, 1992 Appeal from the United Sta
More

980 F.2d 728

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Worrell ROBOTHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6129.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R)

Worrell Robotham, Appellant Pro Se.

Jean Martel Barrett, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Worrell Robotham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robotham, Nos. CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer