Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Freddie Lee Felder v. Lonnie M. Saunders, Warden, 92-6987 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6987 Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 18, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 981 F.2d 1250 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Freddie Lee FELDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6987. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 18, 1992 Appeal from the Un
More

981 F.2d 1250

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Freddie Lee FELDER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6987.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992
Decided: December 18, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

Freddie Lee Felder, Appellant Pro Se.

Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Freddie Lee Felder seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felder v. Saunders, No. CA-92-297 (E.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer