Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jimmy Covington v. K. Gooch C. Seward Roland W. Leary, Sheriff, 92-6360 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6360 Visitors: 31
Filed: Dec. 23, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1055 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jimmy COVINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K. GOOCH; C. Seward; Roland W. Leary, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6360. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: October 20, 1992 Decided: December 23, 1992 App
More

983 F.2d 1055

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jimmy COVINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K. GOOCH; C. Seward; Roland W. Leary, Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6360.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 20, 1992
Decided: December 23, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-124-4)

Jimmy Covington, Appellant Pro Se.

Allan R. Gitter, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jimmy Covington appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Covington v. Gooch, No. CA-91-124-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer