Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert Clayton Caudell v. Sheriff of Powhatan Jail David A. Williams, Warden of State Farm Correction Center Officer Jones Doctor B. M. L. Kapil, 92-6995 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6995 Visitors: 33
Filed: Feb. 22, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1412 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Clayton CAUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF OF POWHATAN JAIL; David A. Williams, Warden of State Farm Correction Center; Officer Jones; Doctor B. M. L. Kapil, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6995. United States Court of
More

986 F.2d 1412

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Clayton CAUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF OF POWHATAN JAIL; David A. Williams, Warden of
State Farm Correction Center; Officer Jones;
Doctor B. M. L. Kapil, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6995.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 22, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-90-1130-N)

Robert Clayton Caudell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert Clayton Caudell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caudell v. Sheriff of Powhatan, No. CA-90-1130-N (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 1992). We deny Caudell's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

In light of our disposition, we deny Caudell's motion for the appointment of counsel

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer