Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lee Roy Thurman v. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, 92-6673 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6673 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 17, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 986 F.2d 1415 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lee Roy THURMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Joseph CURRAN, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-6673. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: January 15, 1993 Decided: February 17, 19
More

986 F.2d 1415

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lee Roy THURMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
J. Joseph CURRAN, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-6673.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 15, 1993
Decided: February 17, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-92-1647-S)

Lee Roy Thurman, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lee Roy Thurman seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Thurman v. Curran, No. CA-92-1647-S (D. Md. June 16, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer