Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Randall Gene Young v. Darnley Hodge John Giangola Nurse Wolfe Sharon Shiley, 93-6329 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6329 Visitors: 64
Filed: May 28, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 993 F.2d 1542 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Randall Gene YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darnley HODGE; John Giangola; Nurse Wolfe; Sharon Shiley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6329. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 3, 1993 Decided: May 28, 1993
More

993 F.2d 1542

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Randall Gene YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Darnley HODGE; John Giangola; Nurse Wolfe; Sharon Shiley,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6329.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 3, 1993
Decided: May 28, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-170-R)

Randall Gene Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Randall Gene Young appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Hodge, No. CA-92-170-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer