Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

George Anthony Alston, Sr. v. Department of Corrections at Richmond Captain at Stafford Jail, 93-6203 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6203 Visitors: 61
Filed: Jun. 23, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 996 F.2d 1210 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. George Anthony ALSTON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT RICHMOND; Captain at Stafford Jail, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6203. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 7, 1993. Deci
More

996 F.2d 1210

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Anthony ALSTON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT RICHMOND; Captain at Stafford
Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6203.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993.
Decided: June 23, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-188-AM)

George Anthony Alston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

George Anthony Alston, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alston v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-93-188-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Alston requests relief beyond the transfer he sought in his Complaint, he must file a new action

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer