Filed: Aug. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1241 ANDREA J. MAGWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAYNE WHITWORTH, in his individual capacity; KELLE SPEARS, Defendants – Appellees, And HERITAGE TRUST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; FAMILY ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; TONI MELENDEZ, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:09-cv-02751-RMG) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1241 ANDREA J. MAGWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAYNE WHITWORTH, in his individual capacity; KELLE SPEARS, Defendants – Appellees, And HERITAGE TRUST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; FAMILY ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; TONI MELENDEZ, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:09-cv-02751-RMG) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided:..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1241
ANDREA J. MAGWOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE WHITWORTH, in his individual capacity; KELLE SPEARS,
Defendants – Appellees,
And
HERITAGE TRUST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION; FAMILY ASSISTANCE
MANAGEMENT SERVICES; TONI MELENDEZ,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-02751-RMG)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrea J. Magwood, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson,
SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrea J. Magwood appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Magwood v. Whitworth, No. 2:09-cv-02751-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 18,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3